Wettability of chlorhexidine treated non-carious and caries-affected dentine

25Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The wettability of a surface is a prerequisite for adhesion and the type of dentine plays an important role in this property. This study evaluated the effect of different excipients of chlorhexidine (CHX) on sound and caries-affected dentine wettability. Methods: Flat dentine surfaces were prepared (n = 100) and artificial caries was induced in half of the sample. For each substrate, sound and caries-affected dentine, surfaces were assigned to five groups: (1) smear-covered dentine; (2) smear-free dentine saturated with water; (3) ethanol; (4) 1% CHX in water; or (5) 1% chlorhexidine in ethanol. The infected dentine was ground with 320-grit silicon carbide paper to the level of affected dentine. The smear layer was removed with acid, followed by rinsing, blot drying and the application of each solution (60 seconds). Single Bond 2 was applied to each surface and contact angles were measured using a goniometer. Data were analysed by ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls (α = 0.05). Results: Contact angles were higher on sound dentine, regardless of the treatment. For sound and caries-affected dentine significantly higher angles were obtained on smear-covered dentine. Acid-etched dentine saturated with ethanol and ethanol/CHX resulted in significantly lower angles but only for sound dentine. Neither water and water/CHX nor ethanol and ethanol/CHX solutions differ with respect to dentine wettability. Conclusions: Caries-affected dentine wettability is higher than sound dentine, and chlorhexidine does not influence this property. © 2014 Australian Dental Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ricci, H. A., Scheffel, D. L. S., De Souza Costa, C. A., Dos Santos, F. J., Jafelicci, J., & Hebling, J. (2014). Wettability of chlorhexidine treated non-carious and caries-affected dentine. Australian Dental Journal, 59(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12150

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free