“I Sign, Therefore I am” (Un)stable Traces of Professional Practices

  • Gherardi S
  • Landri P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Signatures will be read as (un)stable traces of professional knowledges, practices, and identities. The paper intends to propose a theoretical framework to explore the sociomateriality of signature in occupational and professional practices. This exploration will be conducted by assuming a practice-based approach to “signing in practice” and therefore by paying attention to knowing as a situated practice within organizations. The aim of the paper is to invite to a line of research that considers signatures—in occupational and professional practices—as “matters of fact,” i.e. stable traces resistant to disputation that “make” the professional accountable, and as “social fabrications,” i.e. traces which emerge from professional learning and knowing, thus resulting from stable negotiations of human and nonhuman assemblages.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gherardi, S., & Landri, P. (2014). “I Sign, Therefore I am” (Un)stable Traces of Professional Practices. Professions and Professionalism, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.618

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free