Laxity after cruciate ligament injury in 94 knees: the KT-1000 arthrometer versus roentgen stereophotogrammetry

48Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We examined 94 knees with chronic anterior cruciate ligament injuries, 55 of which had been operated with ligament reconstruction, using the KT-1000 arthrometer (89 N anterior force) and roentgen stereophotogrammetry (RSA, 150 N anterior, 80 N posterior force). In intact knees the tibial displacement did not differ between the methods. In injured knees, operated or not, the KT-1000 recorded smaller AP translations and side-differences than RSA. Thus, the stabilizing effect of reconstructive surgery may be overrated, if evaluated with the standard KT-1000 technique. © 1993 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jonsson, H., Kärrholm, J., & Elmqvist, L. G. (1993). Laxity after cruciate ligament injury in 94 knees: the KT-1000 arthrometer versus roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Orthopaedica, 64(5), 567–570. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679308993694

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free