Formal Review of Constitutional Court Decision: Annotation to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 145/PUU-XXI/2023

ISSN: 25481657
0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article discusses issue concerning formal review of Constitutional Court decision. This article comments the Constitutional Court Decision Number 145/PUU-XXI/2023. The Application requests the Constitutional Court to conduct formal review to Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. This issue is very interesting. The Constitutional Court does not have authority over this case because such authority is not explicitly granted by the positive law which is the basis of the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction. The Constitutional Court rejected the Applicants’ application on the grounds that Constitutional Court Decision was not legislation. This verdict is correct, but not interesting. On that basis, this article argues that this issue is about whether the Constitutional Court will use its judicial discretion or not to decide the case. This article proposes the thesis that although it can exercise judicial discretion, the Constitutional Court should not exercise that discretion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abadi, S. (2025, March 14). Formal Review of Constitutional Court Decision: Annotation to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 145/PUU-XXI/2023. Jurnal Konstitusi. Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free