Bifactor and Hierarchical Models: Specification, Inference, and Interpretation

205Citations
Citations of this article
183Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Bifactor and other hierarchical models have become central to representing and explaining observations in psychopathology, health, and other areas of clinical science, as well as in the behavioral sciences more broadly. This prominence comes after a relatively rapid period of rediscovery, however, and certain features remain poorly understood. Here, hierarchical models are compared and contrasted with other models of superordinate structure, with a focus on implications for model comparisons and interpretation. Issues pertaining to the specification and estimation of bifactor and other hierarchical models are reviewed in exploratory as well as confirmatory modeling scenarios, as are emerging findings about model fit and selection. Bifactor and other hierarchical models provide a powerful mechanism for parsing shared and unique components of variance, but care is required in specifying and making inferences about them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Markon, K. E. (2019, May 7). Bifactor and Hierarchical Models: Specification, Inference, and Interpretation. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095522

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free