Stimuli that signal the absence of reinforcement are paid more attention than are irrelevant stimuli

8Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

According to established theories of attention (e.g., Mackintosh, 1975; Sutherland & Mackintosh, 1971), simple discriminations of the form AX+ BX- result in an increase in attention to stimuli A and B, which are relevant to the outcome that follows them, at the expense of X, which is irrelevant. Experiments that have apparently shown such changes in attention have failed to determine whether attention is enhanced to both A and B, which signal reinforcement and nonreinforcement, respectively, or just to A. In Experiments 1 and 2, pigeons were trained with a number of discriminations of the kind AX+ BX-, before compounds that had been consistently nonreinforced were involved in a subsequent discrimination. Both experiments provided support for theories that propose that more attention is paid to stimuli that consistently signal nonreinforcement than to irrelevant stimuli in simple discriminations. © 2010 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dopson, J. C., Williams, N. A., Esber, G. R., & Pearce, J. M. (2010). Stimuli that signal the absence of reinforcement are paid more attention than are irrelevant stimuli. Learning and Behavior, 38(4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.38.4.337

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free