Abstract
Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) offers a cost-effective alternative to general anesthesia (GA) for wound debridement, improving patient safety, surgical accessibility, and cost-efficiency. This study explores WALANT’s cost-effectiveness and patient outcomes in a resource-limited setting. The patient, E.M., a 27-year-old woman, presented with left upper limb swelling, which began a week after Implanon device removal at another facility. Upon admission, she displayed severe sepsis symptoms, including a blood pressure of 100/58 mmHg, a heart rate of 144 beats per minute, a respiratory rate of 24 breaths per minute, and a temperature of 39.2℃. Her left upper limb showed swelling, redness, and shininess, leading to a diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis with septic shock. Initially, wound debridement was conducted under GA. However, the patient’ s choice to undergo WALANT for her second debridement saved her 89.1% of the cost of performing debridement under GA. This cost reduction significantly benefited the uninsured patient, alleviating the financial burden and also achieved a favorable patient outcome within the constraints of a resource-limited setting.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Juttla, C. S., & Jani, P. G. (2024). Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) Technique: A Case Report Demonstrating Its Cost-Effectiveness in a Resource-Limited Setting. Annals of African Surgery, 21(4), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.4314/aas.v21i4.3
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.