A comparative study of student mobility programs in SEAMEO-RIHED, UMAP, and Campus Asia

  • Chi Hou A
  • Hill C
  • Chen K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the student mobility programs of the three initiatives – in Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization-Regional Institution of Higher Education and Development, University Mobility in Asia and Pacific (UMAP), and Campus Asia – and provide a comparative analysis of the respective programs in terms of the role of government, institutional involvement, quality assurance, and challenges. In addition, the paper will assess their impacts on higher education regionalization by regulatory models toward the end of the paper. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts qualitative document analysis as a major research method to explore the developmental models of three student mobility programs. Document analysis is an approach used to gather and review the content of existing written documentation related to the study in order to extract pieces of information in a rigorous and systematic manner. Findings ASEAN International Mobility for Students (AIMS), Col...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chi Hou, A. Y., Hill, C., Chen, K. H.-J., Tsai, S., & Chen, V. (2017). A comparative study of student mobility programs in SEAMEO-RIHED, UMAP, and Campus Asia. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 11(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/heed-08-2017-003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free