Unconscious perception and the classic, dissociation paradigm: A new angle?

24Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Reingold and Merikle's (1988, 1990) critique of the classic dissociation paradigm identified the exhaustiveness, exclusiveness, null sensitivity, and task comparability issues as inherent problems that severely undermine the utility of this paradigm. Snodgrass, Bernat, and Shevrin (2004) attempt to provide solutions to these problems and claim to propose a novel conceptual and methodological framework for the study of unconscious perception. Unfortunately, the present analysis indicates that the approach proposed by Snodgrass et al. involves the same problems as do previous implementations of the classic dissociation paradigm.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reingold, E. M. (2004). Unconscious perception and the classic, dissociation paradigm: A new angle? Perception and Psychophysics. Psychonomic Society Inc. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194981

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free