Span Identification of Epistemic Stance-Taking in Academic Written English

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Responding to the increasing need for automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems to assess language use beyond lexis and grammar (Burstein et al., 2016), we introduce a new approach to identify rhetorical features of stance in academic English writing. Drawing on the discourse-analytic framework of engagement in the Appraisal analysis (Martin & White, 2005), we manually annotated 4,688 sentences (126,411 tokens) for eight rhetorical stance categories (e.g., PROCLAIM, ATTRIBUTION) and additional discourse elements. We then report an experiment to train machine learning models to identify and categorize the spans of these stance expressions. The best-performing model (RoBERTa + LSTM) achieved macro-averaged F1 of .7208 in the span identification of stance-taking expressions, slightly outperforming the intercoder reliability estimates before adjudication (F1 = .6629).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eguchi, M., & Kyle, K. (2023). Span Identification of Epistemic Stance-Taking in Academic Written English. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 429–442). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.bea-1.35

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free