The Enemy Within? Article 259 TFEU and the EU's Rule of Law Crisis

Abstract

This article explores the role which Member State-led infringement proceedings can play in overcoming the EU's rule of law crisis, and hypothesizes that it can prove helpful in breaking the current impasse. It begins by understanding why the EU's traditional rule of law enforcement mechanisms-such as Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the recent rule of law conditionality regulation-have failed (Section 2), before exploring how infringement proceedings operate, what their shortcomings are, and why Scheppele's proposed systemic infringement proceedings are important (Section 3). It then seeks to apply said findings to the rule of law crisis, using two recent developments as an example: The oral proceedings of Commission v. Poland (Régime disciplinaire des juges) and a recent vote by the Dutch Parliament compelling its government to take Poland before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Section 4). Finally, it explores the broader constitutional implications of relying on Article 259 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) to overcome the rule of law crisis: It discusses Kochenov's notion of biting intergovernmentalism, what Article 259 illustrates about the European Union's (EU) hybrid constitution, and how intergovernmental legal instruments can facilitate further European integration (Section 5). It concludes by restating and summing up article's hypothesis.