Sleep misperception in healthy adults: Implications for insomnia diagnosis

39Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Study Objectives: Time estimation is a complex cognitive task that is especially challenging when the time period includes sleep. To determine the accuracy of sleep duration perception, we investigated 44 healthy subjects participating in multi-day inpatient sleep protocols during which they had extended nighttime and short daytime sleep opportunities but no time cues or knowledge of time of day. Methods: The fi rst sleep opportunity was at habitual sleep time and duration. The subsequent 3, 4, or 11 days had 12-h nighttime sleep opportunities and 4-h daytime nap opportunities, potentially creating an experimentally induced "insomnia" with substantial time awake during scheduled sleep. Results: Subjective sleep duration estimates were accurate for the fi rst (habitual) sleep opportunity. The subjective reports following nighttime 12-h sleep opportunities signifi cantly underestimated objective sleep duration, while those following daytime 4-h sleep opportunities signifi cantly overestimated objective sleep duration. Misperception errors were not explained by poor sleep effi ciency, which was lower during 4-h (~39%) than 12-h opportunities (~71%). Subjective sleep estimates after 4-h opportunities correlated with the percentage of REM and N3 sleep. Subjective sleep estimates following 12-h opportunities were, unexpectedly, negatively correlated with NREM stage 2 sleep. Conclusion: The estimation of sleep duration in the absence of time cues may depend on length of sleep opportunity and/ or time of day. The results have implications for understanding sleep state misperception, which is an important consideration in patients with insomnia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bianchi, M. T., Wang, W., & Klerman, E. B. (2012). Sleep misperception in healthy adults: Implications for insomnia diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 8(5), 547–554. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.2154

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free