Atherectomy Plus Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Disease Compared to Balloon Angioplasty Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

6Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The role of atherectomy in treating femoropopliteal disease has been evolving rapidly. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of adjunctive atherectomy to percutaneous balloon angioplasty (BA) (plain balloon and drug-coated BA) remains controversial. We sought to perform a meta-analysis comparing atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (ABA) versus BA alone in treating femoropopliteal disease. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception through January 10, 2022) for studies comparing ABA versus BA for femoropopliteal disease. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency, and bailout stenting were the primary outcomes. Results: Nine studies with 699 patients were included (4 randomized and 5 retrospective studies). Compared to BA alone, the ABA group showed a significant decrease in TLR driven by nonrandomized studies (RR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P =.005) and bailout stenting (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.48; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abusnina, W., Al-Abdouh, A., Radaideh, Q., Kanmanthareddy, A., Shishehbor, M. H., White, C. J., … Paul, T. K. (2022, November 1). Atherectomy Plus Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Disease Compared to Balloon Angioplasty Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100436

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free