Myopia progression of full correction and undercorrection with myopic anisometropia

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the change of refractive error between the full-correction and under-correction treatment groups of myopic anisometropic patients. Methods: This study included 36 patients who had no amblyopia with myopic anisometropia > 3.00 diopters (D) and less than 6.00 D using the cycloplegic refraction test. The patients were divided into two groups involving the full-correction of both eyes (group 1) or full-correction on the less myopic eye and under-correction with -0.50 D of the more myopic eye (group 2). We monitored refractive changes every 6 months for 24 months. Results: At the first visit, the mean refractive error of the less myopic eye was -0.68 ± 0.54 D and that of the more myopic eye was -4.22 ± 0.77 D in group 1. The mean refractive error of the less myopic eye was -0.75 ± 0.58 D and that of the more myopic eye was -4.36 ± 0.73 D in group 2. There was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.713 and p = 0.585, respectively). At 24 months, the mean refractive errors of group 1 were -1.27 ± 0.54 D and -4.88 ± 0.81 D, respectively, and that of group 2 were 1.38 ± 0.54 D and -5.59 ± 1.01 D, respectively. The mean refractive error of the less myopic eyes showed no significant difference between both groups (p = 0.555), but that of the more myopic eyes was significantly different (p = 0.027). Between both groups, the degree of anisometropia at 24 months was 3.61 ± 0.60 in group 1 and 4.20 ± 0.86 in group 2. Group 2 showed a significant difference and more severe anisometropic changes (p = 0.022). Conclusions: Full correction of myopic anisometropia without amblyopia is a better method for reducing the progression of anisometropia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, J. H., Kim, C. R., & Yoo, J. M. (2018). Myopia progression of full correction and undercorrection with myopic anisometropia. Journal of Korean Ophthalmological Society, 59(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2018.59.2.164

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free