Ideological drivers of participatory democracy in Europe: disentangling the different approaches of populism and post-materialist politics

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Empirical literature regarding which actors support the most participatory democracy is surprisingly scarce. Discussing the core ideological features of populist and post-materialist-centred parties, we expect that these parties emphasise participatory democracy more than their competitors. Additionally, populist parties should embody a monist demand for greater participatory democracy, while post-materialist-centred (PMC) parties should advocate a pluralist understanding of it. Drawing on party electoral manifestos, we verify these assumptions in several national elections across Europe. Our findings show mixed support for the theoretical expectations. Both post-materialist and populist parties support participatory democracy more than other parties, and their principles diverge. More precisely, our data confirm that PMC parties advocate a pluralist understanding of participatory democracy. Yet populist parties show a fuzzier picture. While populist radical right parties exhibit a monist profile, radical left populist parties are much more in line with post-materialist arguments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piccolino, G., & Puleo, L. (2024). Ideological drivers of participatory democracy in Europe: disentangling the different approaches of populism and post-materialist politics. European Political Science, 23(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-023-00432-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free