Abstract
Formalization of a part of [11]. Unfortunately, not all is possible to be formalized. Namely, in the paper there is a mistake in the proof of Lemma 3. It states that there exists x ∈ M1 such that M1(x) > N1(x) and (λy ∈ N1)x χ y. It should be M1(x) N1(x). Nevertheless we do not know whether x ∈ N1 or not and cannot prove the contradiction. In the article we referred to [8], [9] and [10].
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Bancerek, G. (2016). On Multiset Ordering. Formalized Mathematics, 24(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1515/forma-2016-0008
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free