Comparison of solid acid catalysts in the production of ethyl β-naphthyl ether (neroline) by ethoxylation of β-naphthol

26Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The mesoporous molecular sieves Al-MCM-41 with Si/Al ratios equal to 21, 42 and 83 were synthesized under hydrothermal conditions using cetyltrimethylammonium (CTMA+) surfactants as template in the absence of auxiliary organics. The same ratios of Al-MCM-41 materials were impregnated using sulfuric acid; the materials are sulfated Al-MCM-41 (SO42-/Al-MCM-41). The mesoporous SO42-/Al-MCM-41 materials were characterized using several techniques, e.g. CP-AES, Nephelometer, XRD, FTIR, thermogravimetric-differential thermal analysis (TG/DTA), 27Al-MAS-NMR, nitrogen adsorption and pyridine acidity (TPD and FTIR) measurements. Crystallinity, surface area, pore diameter and pore volume of SO42-/Al-MCM-41 decreased on expelling the aluminum from the Al-MCM-41 framework and the Lewis acidity increased. The Bronsted, Lewis acidity and total acidity of the SO42-/Al-MCM-41 materials were determined by FTIR-pyridine and TPD-Pyridine acidity measurements. The catalytic results were compared with those obtained by using Al-MCM-41, sulfuric acid, amorphous silica-alumina, H-β, USY and H-ZSM-5 zeolites. The SO42-/Al-MCM-41 catalysts were found to be more effective in the ethoxylation of hydroxyl biaromatics, for example, in the production of ethyl β-naphthyl ether (neroline) from β-naphthol using ethyl acetate as the ethoxylating reagent. The SO42-/Al-MCM-41 catalyst exclusively forms the product of ethyl β-naphthyl ether and has much higher selectivity than any other catalysts except USY. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Selvaraj, M., Sinha, P. K., Seshadri, K. S., & Pandurangan. (2004). Comparison of solid acid catalysts in the production of ethyl β-naphthyl ether (neroline) by ethoxylation of β-naphthol. Applied Catalysis A: General, 265(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2004.01.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free