Quantitative assessment of filter-based cDNA microarrays: Gene expression profiles of human T-lymphoma cell lines

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Motivation: While the use of cDNA microarrays for functional genomic analysis has become commonplace, relatively little attention has been placed on false positives, i.e. the likelihood that a change in measured radioactive or fluorescence intensity may reflect a change in gene expression when, in fact, there is none. Since cDNA arrays are being increasingly used to rapidly distinguish biomarkers for disease detection and subsequent assay development (Wellman et al., Blood, 96, 398-404, 2000), the impact of false positives can be significant. For the use of this technology, it is necessary to develop quantitative criteria for reduction of false positives with radioactively-labeled cDNA arrays. Results: We used a single source of RNA (HuT78 T lymphoma cells) to eliminate sample variation and quantitatively examined intensity ratios using radioactively labeled cDNA microarrays. Variation in intensity ratios was reduced by processing microarrays in side-by-side (parallel mode) rather than by using the same microarray for two hybridizations (sequential mode). Based on statistical independence, calculation of the expected number of false positives as a function of threshold showed that a detection limit of log2 R > 0.65 with agreement from three replicates could be used to identify up- or down-modulated genes. Using this quantitative criteria, gene expression differences between two related T lymphoma cell lines, HuT78 and H9, were identified. The relevance of these findings to the known functional differences between these cell types is discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dodson, J. M., Charles, P. T., Stenger, D. A., & Pancrazio, J. J. (2002). Quantitative assessment of filter-based cDNA microarrays: Gene expression profiles of human T-lymphoma cell lines. Bioinformatics, 18(7), 953–960. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.7.953

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free