Real-world healthcare resource utilization and costs of weekly versus every-2-week cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs (HC) for every-2-week (Q2W) versus weekly (Q1W) cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients & methods: Patients with mCRC receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy in a line-agnostic setting. Cohort study of patients with mCRC treated with cetuximab and chemotherapy in IBM MarketScan. Analyses were weighted by inverse probability of treatment based on propensity score. Results: HRU was numerically lower with the Q2W versus Q1W regimen (weighted mean, 8.1 vs 9.5 encounters per-patient-per-month). The weighted average of HC was $17,653 and $16,469 per-patient-per-month for the Q2W and Q1W regimens, respectively; the difference between regimens decreased when restricting to CRC-related claims. Conclusion: HRU was lower and HC were similar between the Q2W and Q1W regimens.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pescott, C. P., Boutmy, E., Batech, M., Ronga, P., & Lamy, F. X. (2021). Real-world healthcare resource utilization and costs of weekly versus every-2-week cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 10(5), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0232

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free