EpiSmart Crosslinking for Keratoconus: A Phase 2 Study

Abstract

Purpose:The aim of this study was to assess changes in visual acuity after epithelium-on ("epi-on") corneal crosslinking after a diagnosis of keratoconus.Methods:Subjects with corneal ectatic diseases were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups and treated with an epi-on crosslinking system including riboflavin/sodium iodide and pulsed UVA exposure (EpiSmart, CXL Ophthalmics, Encinitas, CA). The UVA treatment groups were 2.4 J/cm2over 20 minutes, 3.6 J/cm2over 20 minutes, and 3.6 J/cm2over 30 minutes. The primary end point was logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Secondary end points were logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), maximum corneal curvature (Kmax), and minimum corneal thickness. Data were assessed 6 and 12 months post-operatively, using t-tests for differences from baseline.Results:Two thousand two hundred twenty-eight subjects were treated with epi-on crosslinking. One thousand nine hundred twenty-two subjects had a diagnosis of keratoconus; other treated eyes had postsurgical and other ectasias. At 6 and 12 months, the subjects with keratoconus demonstrated significant improvements in CDVA, UCVA, and Kmax; minimum corneal thickness was unchanged. One hundred ninety-five subjects (8.7%) reported at least 1 adverse event (AE). A mild corneal epithelial defect was reported in 31 cases (1.4%) and was the only AE reported in >1% of subjects. There were no serious AEs related to the treatment.Conclusions:EpiSmart epi-on crosslinking resulted in mean improvements in CDVA, UCVA, and Kmax at both 6 and 12 months and an excellent safety and efficacy profile in subjects with keratoconus, with few significant side effects. Differences between UVA treatment groups were not significant.