Autonomy versus futility? barriers to good clinical practice in end-of-life care: A queensland case

14Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Findings from a Queensland coronial inquest highlight the complex clinical, ethical and legal issues that arise in end-of-life care when clinicians and family members disagree about a diagnosis of clinical futility.• The tension between the law and best medical practice is highlighted in this case, as doctors are compelled to seek family consent to not commence a futile intervention.• Good communication between doctors and families, as well as community and professional education, is essential to resolve tensions that can arise when there is disagreement about treatment at the end of life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lawrence, S., Willmott, L., Milligan, E., Winch, S., White, B., & Parker, M. (2012). Autonomy versus futility? barriers to good clinical practice in end-of-life care: A queensland case. Medical Journal of Australia, 196(6), 404–405. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja10.10969

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free