Toward simulating the human way of comparing concepts

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An ability to assess similarity lies close to the core of cognition. Its understanding support the comprehension of human success in tasks like problem solving, categorization, memory retrieval, inductive reasoning, etc, and this is the main reason that it is a common research topic. In this paper, we introduce the idea of semantic differences and commonalities between words to the similarity computation process. Five new semantic similarity metrics are obtained after applying this scheme to traditional WordNet-based measures. We also combine the node based similarity measures with a corpus-independent way of computing the information content. In an experimental evaluation of our approach on two standard word pairs datasets, four of the measures outperformed their classical version, while the other performed as well as their unmodified counterparts. Copyright © 2011 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menéndez-Mora, R. E., & Ichise, R. (2011). Toward simulating the human way of comparing concepts. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E94-D(7), 1419–1429. https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.E94.D.1419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free