Tension and Rivalry: The 'Belt and Road' Initiative, Global Governance, and International Law

10Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article attempts to establish a context in which the controversies of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its practice can be better understood. It is argued that, earlier, the background to the birth of the BRI had effectively determined the initial perception of the initiative as a geopolitical move and that this perception has increasingly led to a view that the initiative is a Chinese geo-economic strategy. While there is no universally agreed meaning of the notion 'geo-economics', this notion, more often than not, conjures images of winners and losers in geopolitical manoeuvring. As such, China needs to convince the world that the BRI is indeed a 'win-win' scenario in international cooperation. To do so, China needs to engage much more closely with international law and talk less about China's own model of global governance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, J. (2020, June 1). Tension and Rivalry: The “Belt and Road” Initiative, Global Governance, and International Law. Chinese Journal of Comparative Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxaa009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free