Penalaran Profetik Perspektif Ibnu Taimiyyah (Kritik Ibnu Taimiyyah Terhadap Silogisme Yunani)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore Ibnu Taymiya's critique of the speculative style of syllogistic rationality which is currently undergoing an epistemological disclaimer because it is alienate from transcendence and humanitarian values. The criticism is mainly for two things namely negative propositions in syllogism limiting the metaphysical dimension, and negative propositions are accept as procedural consensus truths not because of empirical facts. Syllogism in the view of Ibnu Taymiyya only produced hypothetical conceptual knowledge. In a syllogistic rule that is rely upon is the inferential procedure which results in statements that are not contradictory or tautological. However, Ibnu Taymiyya's view proved inaccurate, especially on the principle of implication, causality and consistency. Ibnu Taymiyya proposed analogical reasoning (âs) which is one of the ushû reasoning models for constructing inferences based on axiomatic texts based on text (ânî) and facts (burhani). Prophetic reasoning rules are construct in two steps, namely analogical assessment (tashdîq) and inference methods based on eliminative deduction.