Comparison of twin mix and revamped twin mix in mandibular third molar surgery-a randomised controlled double blinded study

Abstract

Mandibular third molar surgery is one of the most common minor oral surgical procedures performed by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. It is vital to pro-vide the most comfortable postoperative phase to the patient and for this rea-son dexamethasone, a corticosteroid, is popularly used in various routes. The intraspace injection of dexamethasone mixed with 2% lignocaine and 4% arti-caine named, Twin Mix and Modified Twin Mix respectively is gaining increasing popularity. 0.5% Centbucridine is a safe alternative to 2% lignocaine with more cardio stable properties. In this study we aimed to evaluate the compa-rability of Twin Mix(TM) and Revamped Twin Mix(RTM) (mixture of dexam-ethasone and centbucridine) with respect to its anesthetic properties and its effectiveness in managing postoperative sequelae following mandibular third molar surgery. For this, a randomised controlled double blinded study was conducted among patients reporting to the Out Patient Department of a dental college. The sample size of the population studied was 32, 16 in Group A (RTM) and 16 in Group B (TM). The primary outcomes measured were facial swelling and mouth opening on postoperative day(POD) 1, 3 and 7. The secondary outcomes were VAS score during the surgical procedure, duration and latency of anesthesia. The data were analysed descriptively and using Stu-dent’s t Test. Representations were given in graphical and tabular forms. The mean postoperative mouth opening and facial swelling on POD 1, 3 and 7 were comparable and did not show any statistically significant difference. Similarly, the VAS score during procedure, latency and duration of anesthesia were comparable with no statistically significant difference. In conclusion, RTM can be used as an alternative to TM due to its comparable properties.