Reduced-intensity transplantation for lymphomas using haploidentical related donors vs HLA-matched unrelated donors

250Citations
Citations of this article
126Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We evaluated 917 adult lymphoma patients who received haploidentical (n 5 185) or HLAmatched unrelated donor (URD) transplantation either with (n 5 241) or without antithymocyte globulin (ATG; n 5 491) following reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. Haploidentical recipients received posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versushost disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, whereas URD recipients received calcineurin inhibitorbased prophylaxis. Median follow-up of survivors was 3 years. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD on univariate analysis was 8%, 12%, and 17% in the haploidentical, URD without ATG, and URD with ATG groups, respectively (P 5 .44). Corresponding 1-year rates of chronic GVHD on univariate analysis were 13%, 51%, and 33%, respectively (P < .001).Onmultivariate analysis, grade III-IV acuteGVHDwas higher in URD without ATG (P 5 .001), as well as URD with ATG (P 5 .01), relative to haploidentical transplants. Similarly, relative to haploidentical transplants, risk of chronic GVHD was higher in URDwithout ATGandURD withATG(P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kanate, A. S., Mussetti, A., Kharfan-Dabaja, M. A., Ahn, K. W., Digilio, A., Beitinjaneh, A., … Hamadani, M. (2016). Reduced-intensity transplantation for lymphomas using haploidentical related donors vs HLA-matched unrelated donors. Blood, 127(7), 938–947. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-09-671834

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free