Comparison of two standard techniques of general anaesthesia for day-case cataract surgery

29Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have assessed general anaesthesia for day-case cataract surgery in 40 patients more than 60 yr of age. The patients were allocated randomly to receive either an infusion of propofol or etomidate-vecuronium-isoflurane anaesthesia. Patients in the propofol group experienced significant reductions in mean arterial pressure (42%) during anaesthesia. In the etomidate-vecuronium-isoflurane group there was a significant increase in both mean arterial pressure (19%) and heart rate (21%) with intubation. During maintenance of anaesthesia in this group, mean arterial pressure and heart rate decreased to 88% and 80% of awake values. Both techniques produced similar reductions in intraocular pressure. Recovery times from cessation of anaesthesia to spontaneous eye opening and ability to give correct date of birth were significantly shorter in the etomidate-isoflurane group. Two hours after surgery there were no significant differences between the groups and cognitive mental function tests were similar to preoperative values. All patients were deemed fit for discharge home 2 h after surgery. We conclude that it is feasible to provide general anaesthesia for day-case cataract surgery. Etomidate-vecuronium-isoflurane anaesthesia appeared to be superior to propofol in this age group as it was associated with less hypotension and a more rapid recovery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moffat, A., & Cullen, P. M. (1995). Comparison of two standard techniques of general anaesthesia for day-case cataract surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 74(2), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/74.2.145

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free