Interior models of saturn: Including the uncertainties in shape and rotation

60Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The accurate determination of Saturn's gravitational coefficients by Cassini could provide tighter constraints on Saturn's internal structure. Also, occultation measurements provide important information on the planetary shape which is often not considered in structure models. In this paper we explore how wind velocities and internal rotation affect the planetary shape and the constraints on Saturn's interior. We show that within the geodetic approach the derived physical shape is insensitive to the assumed deep rotation. Saturn's re-derived equatorial and polar radii at 100 mbar are found to be 54,445 ± 10 km and 60,365 ± 10 km, respectively. To determine Saturn's interior, we use one-dimensional three-layer hydrostatic structure models and present two approaches to include the constraints on the shape. These approaches, however, result in only small differences in Saturn's derived composition. The uncertainty in Saturn's rotation period is more significant: with Voyager's 10h39m period, the derived mass of heavy elements in the envelope is 0-7 M ⊕. With a rotation period of 10 h32m, this value becomes <4 M ⊕, below the minimum mass inferred from spectroscopic measurements. Saturn's core mass is found to depend strongly on the pressure at which helium phase separation occurs, and is estimated to be 5-20 M ⊕. Lower core masses are possible if the separation occurs deeper than 4 Mbar. We suggest that the analysis of Cassini's radio occultation measurements is crucial to test shape models and could lead to constraints on Saturn's rotation profile and departures from hydrostatic equilibrium. © 2013. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved..

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Helled, R., & Guillot, T. (2013). Interior models of saturn: Including the uncertainties in shape and rotation. Astrophysical Journal, 767(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free