Factors associated with Chinese pregnant women’s preference for a cesarean section based on the theory of planned behaviour

9Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Cesarean delivery on maternal request is one of the important public health issues in China. Our study aimed to apply the theory of planned behaviour to comprehensively determine the factors regarding pregnant women’s preference for cesarean section and to provide references for establishing measures to reduce cesarean delivery on maternal request. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis was conducted in four women’s and children’s hospitals in China from May to June 2018. Eligible women arriving for routine antenatal visits at these hospitals were recruited to answer a structured questionnaire. A total of 1853 pregnant women consented to participate in the investigation, with a response rate of 88.75%. Finally, 1677 pregnant women (984 nulliparae and 693 multiparae) were involved in the analysis. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were used. Results: Of the study participants, 20.39% preferred cesarean section. For both nulliparae and multiparae, those who had lower scores of attitudes towards vaginal delivery, lower scores of childbirth self-efficacy and higher scores of subjective norms were more likely to prefer cesarean section. Conclusions: Pregnant women’s birth preferences were significantly associated with their attitudes towards the delivery mode, childbirth self-efficacy and subjective norms, which is consistent with the theory of planned behaviour. Interventions to reduce cesarean delivery on maternal request can be developed based on the theory of planned behaviour.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, N., Yin, X., Qiu, L., Yang, Q., Shi, X., Chang, J., … Gong, Y. (2020). Factors associated with Chinese pregnant women’s preference for a cesarean section based on the theory of planned behaviour. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 25(2), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13323

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free