Treatment Alliance: A Bridge over the Religiosity Gap?

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many mental health care patients, regardless of their religious beliefs, prefer a similar outlook on life with their professional caregivers. Patients experience greater openness to discuss religion and spirituality (R/S), mutual understanding, less fear of disapproval and report a higher treatment alliance. The question is whether the core problem of a so-called ‘religiosity gap’ (RG) lies in (a) an objective difference in outlook on life, (b) a perceived difference in outlook on life or (c) in unmet R/S care needs. We explored this by matching data of 55 patients with their respective caregivers for a quantitative analysis. An actual (objective) RG, when patients were religious and caregivers not, was not associated with a lower treatment alliance but a difference in intrinsic religiosity, especially when caregivers scored higher than patients, was related to a lower treatment alliance. A subjective RG, perceived by patients, and a higher level of unmet R/S care needs were also significantly associated with a lower treatment alliance as rated by patients. These results emphasize that sensitivity, respect and openness regarding R/S and secular views are essential elements in treatment and might benefit the treatment relationship.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Nieuw Amerongen-Meeuse, J. C., Liefbroer, A. I., Schaap-Jonker, H., & Braam, A. W. (2024). Treatment Alliance: A Bridge over the Religiosity Gap? Religions, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15070773

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free