Self-coping complexity: Role of self-construal in relational, individual and collective coping styles and health outcomes

13Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Using a tripartite relational (R), individual (I) and collective (C) framework, three studies explored the health benefits of self-coping complexity (SCC). Study 1 (N= 333) developed and validated RIC coping scales. Study 2 (N = 346) identified two clusters of Australians, those with an expansive pattern of multiple self-aspects and coping styles, and those with a more restricted self-coping pattern. Both clusters reported similar stress, but the expansive high SCC cluster reported greater well-being. A culturally diverse sample (N = 225) in Study 3 yielded the expected high SCC RIC self-coping cluster, plus interdependent RC and independent I clusters. Cluster membership was not associated with culture or gender in these studies, but greater SCC did confer a health advantage to men and women from both Eastern and Western cultures. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hardie, E. A., Critchley, C., & Morris, Z. (2006). Self-coping complexity: Role of self-construal in relational, individual and collective coping styles and health outcomes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(3), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00201.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free