A cross-sectional analysis of all vena cava filter placement over 9-years in Brazil: trends and mortality rates in a population of over 200 million

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is a major global health concern, with Vena Cava Filters (VCFs) serving as an alternative to anticoagulation in high-risk patients. Brazil’s VCF trends remain understudied, particularly in its dual public-private healthcare system. This database study allows a broad overview of the Brazilian healthcare landscape. Methods This cross-sectional nationwide analysis used Brazilian public (SUS/TabNet) and private (ANS/D-TISS) healthcare databases (2015–2023) to assess VCF placement rates, regional disparities, and in-hospital mortality. Data included 21,630 procedures, analyzed via generalized linear models (Gamma/Poisson distributions). Results The private system performed 57% of VCFs (12,323) despite covering only 25% of the population, with a 4.25-fold higher procedure rate per capita than the public system (29.45 vs. 6.42 per-million). Women accounted for 57.8% of recipients. The Southeast region dominated (70% private, 40.5% public), while the North and Midwest had the lowest rates. Mortality rates were comparable (public 6.7% vs. private 7.4%, p = 0.066), peaking during COVID-19. Procedure volumes rose 140% over 9-years, contrasting with declining U.S. trends post-FDA restrictions. Conclusions Brazil’s VCF use reflects systemic disparities, with private-system overrepresentation and regional gaps. This study enables unprecedented insights into large-scale VCF implementation across diverse healthcare subsystems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bueno, C. S., Santos, H. M., Castanheira, J. F., Ponte, B. J., Portela, F. S. O., da Silva, M. F. A., … Wolosker, N. (2026). A cross-sectional analysis of all vena cava filter placement over 9-years in Brazil: trends and mortality rates in a population of over 200 million. Clinics, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.100874

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free