The elusive spleen

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to review the experience of general surgeons performing splenectomy in a district general hospital. The outcomes are discussed together with potential reasons for the increasing rarity of the procedure. Methods A retrospective cohort study was carried out of all patients undergoing splenectomy (as identified by a single trust pathology department on receipt of splenic samples) between 1 January 2000 and 1 May 2017. Case notes and computer systems were interrogated for data on operating surgeon, patient demographics, diagnosis, surgical approach (laparoscopic/open/ converted to open), critical care admission and 30-day mortality. Results During the study period, 170 consecutive splenectomies were undertaken by 24 different operating surgeons. There were on average 5.8 planned and 4.2 unplanned splenectomies per year. The 30-day mortality rate for all splenectomies was 8.8%, with an elective 30-day mortality rate of 2.0%. Only 3 of the current consultant surgeons had undertaken more than 6 cases over the 17-year study period. Some senior consultants had not performed any splenectomies (either planned or unplanned) during the 17-year study period. Conclusions Splenectomy is required ever more rarely and experience as a district general hospital consultant is limited. Possible reasons for this include improvements in medical management of haematological diseases, the increasing use of conservative and radiological management for traumatic splenic injury, and a reduction in trauma cases and diversion of such cases to major trauma centres. Trainees and consultants must seek experience during specialty training or via cadaveric training in order to demonstrate competence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dixon, S., & Horgan, L. F. (2019). The elusive spleen. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 101(3), 176–179. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0215

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free