Retention and persistence among STEM students: A comparison of direct admit and transfer students across engineering and science

14Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Improving student retention in particular science, technology, engineering and mathematics majors has focused on identifying strategies, and practices that will encourage students to complete a degree in STEM major. In this paper, we present findings from a study of retention and migration among STEM students, comparing rates across both engineering and science students. We look at all students admitted between 2009-2014, both direct admits and transfer, at a large public university. Transfer students are often neglected in studies of retention and persistence especially in engineering. We found that engineering students are more persistent than science students with retention rates over 60% for engineering students compared to 40% in math. Persistence rates for firsttime students are less than transfer students in the engineering enrollments. Also, as in previous studies, most migration out of discipline occurs in the first two years of enrollment. We also found that among enrolled students, a large number of engineering students (almost 20%) have not declared a major some until later in their studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., Rangwala, H., & Lester, J. (2017). Retention and persistence among STEM students: A comparison of direct admit and transfer students across engineering and science. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2017-June). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--27899

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free