Generic and brand-name L-thyroxine are not bioequivalent for children with severe congenital hypothyroidism

53Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context: In the United States, generic substitution of levothyroxine (L-T4) by pharmacists is permitted if the formulations are deemed to be bioequivalent by the Federal Drug Administration, but there is widespread concern that the pharmacokinetic standard used is too insensitive. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence of a brand-name L-T4 (Synthroid) and an AB-rated generic formulation (Sandoz, Princeton, NJ) in children with severe hypothyroidism. Design: This was a prospective randomized crossover study in which patients received 8 weeks of one L-T4 formulation followed by 8 weeks of the other. Setting: The setting was an academic medical center. Patients: Of 31 children with an initial serum TSH concentration >100 mU/L, 20 had congenital hypothyroidism (CH), and 11 had autoimmune thyroiditis. Main Outcome Measures: The primary endpoint was the serum TSH concentration. Secondary endpoints were the free T4 and total T3 concentrations. Results: The serum TSH concentration was significantly lower after 8 weeks of Synthroid than after generic drug (P <3 yr of age. Our results may have important implications for other severely hypothyroid patients in whom precise titration of L-T4 is necessary. Copyright © 2013 by The Endocrine Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carswell, J. M., Gordon, J. H., Popovsky, E., Hale, A., & Brown, R. S. (2013). Generic and brand-name L-thyroxine are not bioequivalent for children with severe congenital hypothyroidism. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 98(2), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3125

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free