Differences in acceptability of herb plants and oilseed rape for slugs (a. lusitanicus, a. rufus and d. reticulatum) in food choice tests

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The following slug species, Arion lusitanicus, Arion rufus, and Deroceras reticulatum were included in laboratory-based multi-choice food tests consisting of 19 herb plants and oilseed rape. Rates of damage to plants at the growth stage of 2-4 leaves were estimated for each slug species and all tested herb plants using oilseed rape as a reference. The following indices were calculated: acceptability index (A.I.), palatability index (P.I.) and consumption index (C.I.). Based on the obtained results four groups of plants were designated: unacceptable, lowly acceptable, moderately acceptable and highly acceptable. Brassica napus, Ocimum basilicum and Coriandrum sativum were accepted by all three examined slugs while Potentilla anserina and Chamaenerion angustifolium were rejected. The acceptance degree for remaining plants varied according to slug species. © 2008, Versita. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kozłowski, J., & Kozłowska, M. (2008). Differences in acceptability of herb plants and oilseed rape for slugs (a. lusitanicus, a. rufus and d. reticulatum) in food choice tests. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 48(4), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10045-008-0055-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free