Human simulators and standardized patients to teach difficult conversations to interprofessional health care teams

89Citations
Citations of this article
224Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objective. To design and implement a demonstration project to teach interprofessional teams how to recognize and engage in difficult conversations with patients. Design. Interdisciplinary teams consisting of pharmacy students and residents, student nurses, and medical residents responded to preliminary questions regarding difficult conversations, listened to a brief discussion on difficult conversations; formed ad hoc teams and interacted with a standardized patient (mother) and a human simulator (child), discussing the infant's health issues, intimate partner violence, and suicidal thinking; and underwent debriefing. Assessment. Participants evaluated the learning methods positively and a majority demonstrated knowledge gains. The project team also learned lessons that will help better design future programs, including an emphasis on simulations over lecture and the importance of debriefing on student learning. Drawbacks included the major time commitment for design and implementation, sustainability, and the lack of resources to replicate the program for all students. Conclusion. Simulation is an effective technique to teach interprofessional teams how to engage in difficult conversations with patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marken, P. A., Zimmerman, C., Kennedy, C., Schremmer, R., & Smith, K. V. (2010). Human simulators and standardized patients to teach difficult conversations to interprofessional health care teams. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(7), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7407120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free