The importance of continuity of care in the likelihood of future hospitalization: Is site of care equivalent to a primary clinician?

173Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined the effect of continuity with clinicians and health care sites on likelihood of future hospitalization. Methods. Delaware Medicaid patient data were analyzed. Logistic regression models supplied adjusted effects of continuity on hospitalization. Results. Patients in the high clinician continuity group had lower odds of hospitalization than patients in the high site/low clinician continuity group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66, 0.87). The latter group did not differ from the low site/low clinician continuity group (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.80, 1.08). Conclusions. A location providing health care without clinician continuity may not be sufficient to ensure cost-effective care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mainous, A. G., & Gill, J. M. (1998). The importance of continuity of care in the likelihood of future hospitalization: Is site of care equivalent to a primary clinician? American Journal of Public Health, 88(10), 1539–1541. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.88.10.1539

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free