Intra-operative rewarming with Hot Dog® resistive heating and forced-air heating: A trial of lower-body warming

23Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Resistive heating is an alternative to forced-air warming which is currently the most commonly used intra-operative warming system. We therefore tested the hypothesis that rewarming rates are similar with Hot Dog® (Augustine Biomedical) resistive and Bair Hugger® (Arizant) forced-air heating systems. We evaluated 28 patients having major maxillary tumour surgery. During the establishment of invasive monitoring, patients became hypothermic, dropping their core temperature to about 35 °C. They were then randomly assigned to rewarming with lower-body resistive (n = 14) or forced-air (n = 14) heating, with each system set to 'high'. Our primary outcome was the rewarming rate during active heating over a core temperature range from 35 to 37 °C. Morphometric characteristics were comparable in both groups. Temperature increased at twice the rate in patients assigned to forced-air warming, with an estimated mean (SE) slope of 0.49 (0.03) °C.h-1 vs 0.24 (0.02) °C.h-1 (p < 0.001). Resistive heating warmed at half the rate of forced air. © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Röder, G., Sessler, D. I., Roth, G., Schopper, C., Mascha, E. J., & Plattner, O. (2011). Intra-operative rewarming with Hot Dog® resistive heating and forced-air heating: A trial of lower-body warming. Anaesthesia, 66(8), 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06722.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free