SENTENCE STRUCTURE IN HUMAN AND AI-GENERATED TEXTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This mixed-method study analyzes the syntactic differences between human and AI-generated text. To this end, the study includes a corpus of 20 essays (10 human, 10 ChatGPT-generated) across 10 topics, with each sentence in those essays manually coded for structure (simple, compound, complex, compound-complex). Sentence length, total word count, and number of sentences are also measured to gain further insights. Preliminary results indicate that 1. Humans’ sentences are longer, on average; 2. Both human-written and AI-generated texts rarely include compound-complex sentences; 3. 60% of AI-generated text have no compound-complex sentences whatsoever, and 4. Both AI and human texts consistently rely heavily on simple sentences, though human-authored pieces of writing display more variation in their use of simple sentences across different essays.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shalevska, E. (2025). SENTENCE STRUCTURE IN HUMAN AND AI-GENERATED TEXTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Palimpsest, 10(19), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.46763/PALIM25101915sh

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free