Brain motor control assessment post intensive whole-body exercise vs. upper body exercise after spinal cord injury

  • Zoghi M
  • Galea M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of voluntary movements in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) post intensive whole-body training vs. upper body training with brain motor control assessment (BMCA). Methods: Twelve neurologically intact participants and 18 patients with SCI participated in this study as part of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. All participants received 12 weeks training (three times per week), which comprised trunk, upper and lower limb exercises and locomotor training and functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling in whole-body training group and an upper body strength and fitness program for upper body training group. Results: Generalised linear model analysis showed significant effect of the main effect of the Task (P < 0.001) on the similarity index of voluntary movement patterns but not on the other factors or the interactions between them (P > 0.05). Some participants showed significant improvement in muscle strength post 12 weeks training; however, this improvement was not reflected in the pattern of muscle activation which was captured by BMCA. Conclusion: BMCA is a valuable objective assessment tool that could add resolution to the clinical evaluation of patients with SCI post different therapeutic techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zoghi, M., & Galea, M. (2019). Brain motor control assessment post intensive whole-body exercise vs. upper body exercise after spinal cord injury. Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation, 2019. https://doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2019.03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free