Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colon cancer screening: Variable performance with ambient temperature

33Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are widely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but hemoglobin degradation, due to exposure of the collected sample to high temperatures, could reduce test sensitivity. We examined the relation of ambient temperature exposure with FIT positivity rate and sensitivity. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients 50 to 75 years in Kaiser Permanente Northern California's CRC screening program, which began mailing FIT kits annually to screen-eligible members in 2007. Primary outcomes were FIT positivity rate and sensitivity to detect CRC. Predictors were month, season, and daily ambient temperatures of test result dates based on US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data. Results: Patients (n = 472,542) completed 1,141,162 FITs. Weekly test positivity rate ranged from 2.6% to 8.0% (median, 4.4%) and varied significantly by month (June/July vs December/January rate ratio [RR] = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 0.83) and season. FIT sensitivity was lower in June/July (74.5%; 95% CI, 72.5 to 76.6) than January/December (78.9%; 95% CI, 77.0 to 80.7). Conclusions: FITs completed during high ambient temperatures had lower positivity rates and lower sensitivity. Changing kit design, specimen transportation practices, or avoiding periods of high ambient temperatures may help optimize FIT performance, but may also increase testing complexity and reduce patient adherence, requiring careful study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doubeni, C. A., Jensen, C. D., Fedewa, S. A., Quinn, V. P., Zauber, A. G., Schottinger, J. E., … Levin, T. R. (2016). Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colon cancer screening: Variable performance with ambient temperature. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 29(6), 672–681. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.06.160060

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free