Imaginary carrot or effective fertiliser? A rejoinder on funding and productivity

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The question of whether and to what extent research funding enables researchers to be more productive is a crucial one. In their recent work, Mariethoz et al. (Scientometrics, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03.855-1) claim that there is no significant relationship between project-based research funding and bibliometric productivity measures and conclude that this is the result of inappropriate allocation mechanisms. In this rejoinder, we argue that such claims are not supported by the data and analyses reported in the article.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heyard, R., Philipp, T., & Hottenrott, H. (2021, November 1). Imaginary carrot or effective fertiliser? A rejoinder on funding and productivity. Scientometrics. Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04130-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free