An investigation into the causes of unexpected intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography findings

22Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is uncertainty regarding echocardiography before cardiac surgery, especially with regard to timing and disease progression as well as potential errors. We investigated the causes of unexpected intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography findings by performing a 33-month audit. We found that there were 50/797 (6%) unexpected findings that led to an alteration in surgical strategy in 34 (4%) patients. Of the unexpected findings, 25 (50%) were unrelated to pre-operative pathology. After reviewing pre-operative studies and reports, unexpected findings were found to be due to: reporting errors in 20 patients (44%); limitations in transthoracic compared to transoesophageal echocardiography in 14 patients (30%); disease progression in 10 patients (22%); and inter-observer variability in two patients (4%). We identified six reports out of 797 (0.8%) that contained potentially serious errors. Surgical management changed in 18/20 (90%) patients in whom the unexpected change was due to reporting error, compared to 16/30 (53%) patients whose pre-operative echocardiogram was correctly reported (p = 0.006). Our study suggests that pre-operative echocardiography reporting errors are common and important. © 2012 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skinner, H. J., Mahmoud, A., Uddin, A., & Mathew, T. (2012). An investigation into the causes of unexpected intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography findings. Anaesthesia, 67(4), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07022.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free