To Tube, or Not to Tube: Comparing Ventilation Techniques in Microlaryngeal Surgery

11Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: The objective of this study was to compare ventilation techniques utilized in microlaryngeal surgery. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Two-hundred surgeries performed from May 1, 2018 to March 1, 2020 and stratified as intubated, intermittently intubated (AAIV) or apneic. Patient demographics, comorbidities, anesthetic agents, intraoperative parameters/events, and complications were studied and compared across the three groups using inferential analyses. Results: Median body mass index in the AAIV group was significantly higher (33 vs. 29; P =.0117). Median oxygen nadirs were lower in AAIV cases (81% vs. 91–92%) while CO2 peak measurements were lower (33 mmHg vs. 48 mmHg) in the fully apneic cohort which were significantly shorter cases (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Syamal, M. N., Hanisak, J., Macfarlan, J., Ortega, B., Sataloff, R. T., & Benninger, M. S. (2021). To Tube, or Not to Tube: Comparing Ventilation Techniques in Microlaryngeal Surgery. Laryngoscope, 131(12), 2773–2781. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29750

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free