Costs associated with going-concern-modified audit opinions: An analysis of the australian audit market

54Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This article examines the potential costs to Australian auditors and their clients from the issuance of first-time going-concern-modified audit opinions. We examine the population of Australian companies receiving a first-time going-concern-modified audit opinion during the period 1994-97 and a matched sample of financially distressed firms receiving a clean audit opinion. Results indicate that auditor switching is positively associated with receipt of a going-concern-modified opinion. However, we find no empirical evidence that there is a self-fulfilling prophecy of increased probability of company failure following the issuance of a going-concern-modified opinion for the Australian companies in our study. Our analyses of lost audit fees indicate that auditors issuing first-time going-concern-modified audit opinions lost proportionately more fees by losing clients (through switching or company failure) than firms not issuing a going-concern-modified opinion to financially stressed clients. © 2008 Accounting Foundation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carey, P. J., Geiger, M. A., & O’Connell, B. T. (2008). Costs associated with going-concern-modified audit opinions: An analysis of the australian audit market. Abacus, 44(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2007.00249.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free