Evaluating multi-cancer early detection tests: an argument for the outcome of recurrence-updated stage

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The advent of multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests has the potential to revolutionise the diagnosis of cancer, improving patient outcomes through early diagnosis and increased use of curative therapies. The ongoing NHS-Galleri trial is evaluating an MCED test developed by GRAIL, and is using as its primary endpoint the absolute incidence of late-stage cancer. Proponents of this outcome argue that if the test reduces the number of patients with advanced, incurable cancer, it can be reasonably assumed to be benefitting patients by reducing cancer mortality. Here, we argue that this assumption may not always hold due to the phenomenon of micro-metastatic disease, and propose an adjustment to the trial outcome so that it may better reflect the expected effect of the test on cancer mortality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Callister, M. E. J., Crosbie, E. J., Crosbie, P. A. J., & Robbins, H. A. (2023). Evaluating multi-cancer early detection tests: an argument for the outcome of recurrence-updated stage. British Journal of Cancer, 129(8), 1209–1211. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02434-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free