The challenges of evaluating large-scale, multi-partner programmes: The case of NIHR CLAHRCs

26Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The limited extent to which research evidence is utilised in healthcare and other public services is widely acknowledged. The United Kingdom government has attempted to address this gap by funding nine Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs). CLAHRCs aim to carry out health research, implement research findings in local healthcare organisations and build capacity across organisations for generating and using evidence. This wide-ranging brief requires multifaceted approaches; assessing CLAHRCs' success thus poses challenges for evaluation. This paper discusses these challenges in relation to seven CLAHRC evaluations, eliciting implications and suggestions for others evaluating similarly complex interventions with diverse objectives. © The Policy Press 2011 ISSN 1744 2648.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin, G. P., Ward, V., Hendy, J., Rowley, E., Nancarrow, S., Heaton, J., … Ariss, S. (2011). The challenges of evaluating large-scale, multi-partner programmes: The case of NIHR CLAHRCs. Evidence and Policy, 7(4), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426411X603470

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free