Comparative utility of the BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest for predicting falls in individuals with Parkinson disease: A cohort study

94Citations
Citations of this article
237Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. The newly developed Brief-Balance Evaluation System Test (Brief- BESTest) may be useful for measuring balance and predicting falls in individuals with Parkinson disease (PD). Objectives. The purposes of this study were: (1) to describe the balance performance of those with PD using the Brief-BESTest, (2) to determine the relationships among the scores derived from the 3 versions of the BESTest (ie, full BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest), and (3) to compare the accuracy of the Brief- BESTest with that of the Mini-BESTest and BESTest in identifying recurrent fallers among people with PD. Design. This was a prospective cohort study. Methods. Eighty participants with PD completed a baseline balance assessment. All participants reported a fall history during the previous 6 months. Fall history was again collected 6 months (n=51) and 12 months (n=40) later. Results. At baseline, participants had varying levels of balance impairment, and Brief-BESTest scores were significantly correlated with Mini-BESTest (r=.94, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duncan, R. P., Leddy, A. L., Cavanaugh, J. T., Dibble, L. E., Ellis, T. D., Ford, M. P., … Earhart, G. M. (2013). Comparative utility of the BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest for predicting falls in individuals with Parkinson disease: A cohort study. Physical Therapy, 93(4), 542–550. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free