Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement

18Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To understand researcher capability for and interest in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (PC-CER), particularly related to engaging with patients/caregivers. Materials and methods: Web-based survey of 508 health researchers recruited via professional health research organizations. Results: Most respondents (94%) were familiar with CER and many (69%) reported having previously conducting some form of CER. Most respondents were familiar with (81%) and interested in (87%) partnering with patients and/or caregivers in research. Resources to assist in training, coordination of partners, guidance in apply for funding and improved infrastructure were commonly cited factors that would help researchers conduct PC-CER. Conclusion: There is a significant opportunity for researchers to engage patients and caregivers as partners in CER. Researchers recognize the need for additional training and expertise to leverage those opportunities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Forsythe, L. P., Frank, L. B., Workman, T. A., Borsky, A., Hilliard, T., Harwell, D., & Fayish, L. (2017). Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 6(3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2016-0063

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free